|

Issue # 1405 1
April 2009
As US prepares to leave, what’s happening in Iraq?
Susan Webb
As the US moves to wind down its disastrous six-year
occupation of Iraq, what is the shape of the country it is preparing to
leave? Although violence has sharply decreased, suicide bombings and assassinations
continue. On March 8, for example, a suicide bomber in Baghdad killed more
than 30 people in a crowd of police recruits.
Yet US and Iraqi officials say violence is the lowest since
summer 2003, before major sectarian bloodshed engulfed the country. Illustrating
this trend, a million Shiites gathered peacefully for a major religious
celebration on March 6 at the “Golden Dome” mosque in Samarra, a Sunni-majority
city.
In February 2006, armed groups blew up the mosque, touching
off vicious sectarian violence that killed thousands of Iraqis over the
next two years.
This time, Sunni residents welcomed the Shiite pilgrims,
the Los Angeles Times reported, calling
it “the latest sign of reconciliation among Iraqis eager to put the country’s
civil war behind them”.
Daily life still abysmal for most Iraqis
At the same time, conditions of daily life continue to be
abysmal.
A recent United Nations report shows many areas are afflicted
by chronic disease and child malnutrition, lack of regular electricity and
safe water, high unemployment and major illiteracy among women. This includes
Baghdad, home to one-quarter of Iraq’s population.
Widespread corruption has contributed to the lack of progress
in these areas.
Discontent on these issues was a major force in provincial
elections on January 31. Religious parties that controlled various provincial
councils lost out, blamed for corruption and failure to improve living conditions.
Voters reject religious agendas
The results indicated a rejection of religious sectarianism,
a focus on improving concrete conditions, and a developing national consciousness,
said Salam Ali, spokesperson for the Iraqi Communist Party.
The Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, formerly dominant in
the south, suffered a major setback. It pursued narrow religious policies
and ran a campaign saturated with religion. Smaller Shiite religious parties
also lost support.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s coalition, centred on the
Shiite Dawa (Islamic Call) party, came out on top by steering clear of religion.
Supporters of cleric Moqtada al Sadr also avoided religion in their campaigning.
They came in second in Baghdad and some other places, but ran a distant
second in Baghdad’s Sadr City slums, formerly their stronghold.
People voted for Maliki because of his success in curbing
militias responsible for much of the violence of recent years – “it was
like a popular vote against the militias,” Ali commented.
“It’s quite clear the mood of the people has shifted very
significantly away from religious sectarianism and bigotry, toward a more
national mood,” Ali said. While political Islam will continue to play a
big role in Iraq for some time, it has failed to present a coherent vision,
he noted. Islamic parties like Maliki’s “don’t put forward the idea of an
Islamic state, because they cannot get support for this.”
In fact the Maliki platform in the January elections borrowed
heavily from the language of Iraq’s Communists and other democratic secular
groups, including the call for a non-sectarian state based on civil law,
Ali said, adding, “That, by itself, is an admission that his religious version
will not gain support.”
While Maliki got his biggest support in Baghdad and Basra,
in other areas, including heavily Sunni provinces, his vote was much lower.
Diehard Baathists switching gears
In those areas, the formerly dominant Sunni Islamic Party
lost out to a mix of tribal factions, former Báathists, Arab nationalists
and local figures.
Diehard Báathists who boycotted previous elections and organised
much of the armed violence in Iraq have seen their support dwindling. “Many
of them have come to the conclusion that their methods have left them isolated
and they need to get into the political process before it’s too late,” Ali
said.
“People close to such groups are concerned about their political
future when the Americans leave.” Now, they are inviting Hussein-era officers
who fled the country to return and participate, he said. There is talk,
too, about reconstituting the Báath Party under a new format.
The participation of these forces in the political process,
Middle East scholar Juan Cole observes in his blog, is seen as having the
potential to “advance Iraqi reconciliation efforts following years of bloody
sectarian fighting.”
Ali said national reconciliation will take time and will
depend heavily on progress on economic conditions. He said public opinion
was largely favourable to Obama’s withdrawal plan and does not believe the
pullout moves will spur any significant renewal of violence in Iraq. “Terrorist
groups could launch some operations, but their impact is likely to be limited”
as these tactics lose support, he said.
Vote-buying and skewed results
The provincial elections were marred by the bandying about
of huge sums of money to essentially buy votes. The results were also distorted
by a process that favoured the largest vote-getters at the expense of smaller
slates (group participants): it set a very high threshold to win a seat,
and then took the votes that fell below the threshold and distributed them
to the bigger slates. In some provinces, smaller slates received 40 percent
or more of the vote.
The ICP had opposed this procedure as “unfair” before it
was adopted. Now it is calling for a revised election law that ensures greater
representation by reallocating the votes “bottom up” – distributing the
below-threshold votes to the top vote-getters among the smaller slates.
Communists’ campaign
The skewed process is one reason why the Communist Party
lost provincial council seats this time, although it gained some new ones.
One place where it picked up a seat was Tikrit, Saddam Hussein’s hometown.
The ICP drew 100,000 votes in the 14 provinces where elections
were held. This was lower than its total four years ago, Ali said, One reason,
he said, was that sectarian violence had made it impossible for the party
to work openly in some areas until recently. In Sadr City, the Communists
won 5,000 votes this time, but had only campaigned there for two months
because of earlier violence.
The January 31 election process involved a combination of
slates and individual candidacies. This type of campaigning was a new experience
for Iraqi Communists, after decades of repression under the former regime.
Ali said thousands of volunteers participated in the ICP’s
campaign, especially young people, distributing leaflets and organising
motorcades. “This was the first time for years that we campaigned in this
way,” he said.
The campaign was a good learning experience, “a good base
on which we can build,” Ali said. The party recognised a need to do better
in some areas that will be familiar to US political activists – media outreach
and get-out-the-vote efforts. “People think all you have to do is hand out
a leaflet,” he commented.
As in the US, it was often hard to convince voters it was
worthwhile to go out and vote in local elections. Then, when people got
to the polls, in many cases their names were not on the lists.
Turnout overall was lower than previously. Ali said this
was an expression of frustration by many Iraqis over the poor performance
of provincial governments, as well as continuing security problems.
Now the winners will be expected to live up to their promises
to improve basic conditions. If they fail to do so, they will likely pay
a price in municipal elections coming in July, and in December’s national
elections.
People’s Weekly World 
Next article — The deadly
fight for land in Colombia
Back to index page
|