Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1860      March 13, 2019

US weapons not on table

The chance that North Korea will give up its nuclear weapons approximate the chance of survival a snowball has in hell. Whatever one thinks about the leadership of North Korea, with 100 percent certainty we can say the North Koreans act based on what they see the United States actually do as opposed to any promises Donald Trump makes.

We can’t know exactly what Trump said to Kim during their private talks during the summit in Hanoi. Let us assume, for example, that he told Kim the US would not overthrow his government if he gives up his nuclear weapons. What are the chances that Kim would agree to something like that, considering the fact that the US is now threatening to conduct regime change warfare in at least two countries, Iran and Venezuela?

Most of the media punditry around the Trump-Kim talks not only misses this important point but, after missing the point, goes on to deal with only peripheral rather than basic issues. We hear that Trump came back with nothing and that Kim essentially took the president for a ride, using him to promote his own image as a leader on the world stage. We see liberals gloating that “Trump failed” in his mission.

Nowhere on cable TV are they talking about how arrogant and insulting it was to leave out South Korea, a nation of over 50 million people, from the talks. Powerful movements for peace and progress in that country have resulted in the election of a government committed to peace on their peninsula and committed to mutually beneficial trade and other relations between the North and South. Trump only bothered to call the South Korean President Moon Jae-in when he was on the way home after the summit “broke down.”

There is much talk about the fact that there was no agreement on what “de-nuclearisation” means. That’s because the liberal media accepts the outrageous position that it is acceptable to demand that North Korea dismantle its nuclear weapons but that it is not OK to question the right of the United States to have nuclear-armed submarines in the waters surrounding the Korean peninsula. With all the talk last year about North Korean missiles that could reach the US, never mentioned was the fact that US nukes, from where they are positioned, can, in minutes, destroy the entire Korean peninsula – along with Japan and big sections of China.

Talking about “de-nuclearisation” in Korea makes no sense unless US nuclear weapons are also on the table. What the rest of the world combined spends on weapons is dwarfed by the US$700 billion US military budget.

And there’s a lot more to consider:

Trump just cancelled an historic nuclear arms treaty signed in the 1980s by then-President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. That treaty banned the placement of medium-range missiles in Europe. This is particularly dangerous since right-wing regimes in Eastern Europe have been clamouring recently for the placement of such US missiles on their territories, missiles that could destroy major Russian population centres in minutes.

Prior to that, Trump cancelled the nuclear deal with Iran, raising the danger of war breaking out in that region. When he cancelled the deal, his national security adviser, John Bolton, spoke openly about regime change in that country and how the US will celebrate the accomplishment of that at the US embassy in Tehran.

Shortly after he took office, Trump pulled the US out of the historic Paris Climate Accord, endangering the sustainability and the future of the entire planet.

As if all of these things were not enough for the North Korean leadership to take in, there are the open attempts today to drive out the elected government of Venezuela and the declaration by President Trump that an un-elected figure is the real president of that country. US troops are massing in neighbouring Colombia for a possible invasion of Venezuela.

And then there is the memory of other leaders who made deals with the US Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi was told that if he gave up his nuclear ambitions he would not be overthrown. Within a few years of him giving up the plans for the nukes, the US proceeded to assist in overthrowing him anyway. Worse than that, however, is the fact that the US installed ruthless, reactionary terrorists in his place, and today Libya is far worse off than it was under Gaddafi.

Saddam Hussein, too, was overthrown in Iraq by a full-scale US invasion which resulted in the deaths of as many as a million or more Iraqis. Few would argue that Iraq today is any better off than it was before the US invasion.

The fact is that the talks with North Korea failed because Trump, like presidents before him, is carrying out a policy of world domination by US capitalist business interests, a policy that has no use for democracy or human rights or free elections when they get in the way of what’s best for the world’s one percent.

Until we change over to a foreign policy that supports peace, progress, democracy, and labour rights around the world, rather than a foreign policy that props up the international capitalist profiteers, we will have a hard time getting anyone to have faith in negotiations with the US.

People’s World

Next article – Brexit: Fact or fiction?

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA