- by Valentin Cartillier
- The Guardian
- Issue #1958
After Joe Biden’s announcement on 14th April that the United States army will be withdrawing from Afghanistan, Scott Morrison announced the next day that Australia would be following suit. Due to begin on 1st May this year, the complete withdrawal will be finalised by 11th September, bringing to a close the two-decade long, brutal imperialist war. This marks the end of the longest war in US history where 2,400+ US soldiers were killed alongside forty-one Australian soldiers, with tens of thousands more wounded. The cost on the Afghani people has been much greater: 65,000+ security personnel have been killed alongside an estimated 72,000+ Taliban members, and 38,400+ civilians being murdered in the crossfire. This does not take into account the wounded, the psychological damage of survivors, and the destruction of the country’s infrastructure.
The financial cost of the war has also been astronomical; the US military has spent over $US 2.26 trillion over the course of the conflict. One doesn’t need a particularly strong imagination to think of a better way that money could have been spent. Biden’s announcements marked a definitive departure from the policy embraced by four successive US presidential administrations that placed strict conditions on determining how the US might leave Afghanistan. This naturally has caused some panic within the capitalist media and members of the intelligence forces who fear that the Taliban will recapture the country within the next few years.
History of the war
Most histories of the conflict begin with the US invasion after the 11th September attacks. However, the roots of the conflict can be traced further back to the Soviet – Afghan war, which also touches on parts of Afghanistan’s forgotten socialist history.
The People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA), a Marxist-Leninist party, came to power in 1978, marking a new era.
Marilyn Bechtel, a journalist with the Communist Party of USA who visited Afghanistan in 1981-1982, reported that she,“saw the beginnings of progress: women working together in handicraft co-ops, where for the first time they could be paid decently for their work and control the money they earned. Adults, both women and men, learning to read. Women working as professionals and holding leading government positions, including Minister of Education. Poor working families able to afford a doctor, and to send their children – girls and boys – to school. The cancellation of peasant debt and the start of land reform. Fledgling peasant cooperatives. Price controls and price reductions on some key foods. Aid to nomads interested in a settled life.”
She also saw the push back against the PDPA, recalling “the bitter results of Mujahideen attacks […] in those years aimed especially at schools and teachers in rural areas.”
In the post-1978 era, the Soviet Union increased its economic aid to the PDPA for social projects on a much larger scale. Under the new Afghan-Soviet Treaty, funding for infrastructure vastly increased, allowing for the construction of schools, health services including doctor’s clinics and hospitals, mining projects, and agricultural development to flourish in the region. From December 1978, this aid was expanded to include military aid, in the form of troops, at the request of the PDPA, which was at that time combatting displaced warlords who were, according to Bechtel, “aided and organised by the US and Pakistan.”
This military involvement would eventually be extend into a decade-long war, with Soviet troops fighting alongside the newly anointed Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA), controlled by the PDPA, against the warlords and the Mujahideen. The Mujahideen were not a single organised group, but rather, smaller groups united against the DRA and Soviet troops. These groups were funded in large part by the US, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom (UK) as part of a Cold War proxy war, with the US and Saudi Arabia being the biggest financial backers. Some of the members of these groups would go on to form groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, Osama bin-Laden being the most notorious veteran of this conflict.
After the Soviet withdrawal, the DRA was ousted, and a period of civil war ensued where the Taliban vied for power. While much more could be said about the politics of this period, the US military and financial support of the Mujahideen would eventually come back to haunt them on the 11th of September, 2001. Following this attack by Al-Qaeda, many of them still living or hiding in Afghanistan, then-President George W Bush demanded that the Taliban, who were by then more or less ruling Afghanistan, hand over bin Laden. The Taliban refused to extradite bin Laden without clear evidence of his involvement in the attacks. The US refused and instead launched Operation Enduring Freedom on the 7th of October, 2001 with the UK.
The Workers’ Weekly Guardian has extensively covered various aspects of the war in Afghanistan throughout its duration. “Graves for US forces in Afghanistan” #1836, “US bases in Afghanistan?” #1593, “Zero troops in Afghanistan is the right number” #1578, “Death Squads in Afghanistan #1453 to name a few.
Morrison, continuing the long history of Australia being the US military’s lapdog, announced that the final eighty troops will be withdrawn from the region in line with the US withdrawal deadline.
During this announcement, Morrison stated that “Freedom is always worth it […] Australians have always believed that.” As he choked up reading out the list of the dead soldiers, one was left wondering how our “freedom” ended up in Afghanistan. Was giving up those lives in the name of another US imperialist war really “worth it”?
“Freedom” is just another abstract concept used to advance the US’ geopolitical interests in the region which culminated in the wholesale murder of Afghani people and destruction of their country. Morrison also sidestepped the question of Australian troops committing war crimes while in Afghanistan by stating, “there will be time to talk about those things. Today is not that time.” One wonders when, if ever, that time will be?
Assistant Defence Minister Andrew Hastie told military personnel, “the ADF’s core business will always be the application of lethal violence in the defence of our values, sovereignty and interests. We should never forget that.” Hastie, the Liberal MP, who entered Federal Parliament in 2015, previously served in the elite Special Air Service Regiment for five years, including deploying to the war in Afghanistan. He continued, “Mission focus is the foundation of victory. It keeps everyone driving towards a singular purpose.”
Liberal backbencher Phillip Thompson echoed his colleague, warning, “we’ve gone a little bit woke over the past few years, and we can’t afford to be doing that” Thompson, who is also a former soldier, stated “Our ADF shouldn’t be left or right, they should be straight down the middle of what their job is, and their job is to defend our nation, our interests, our values, our sovereignty, but also when we go on operations, have an unapologetic aggression and violence to get the mission done.” Thompson must have been getting his definitions from ASIO, as the ADF cannot be “left or right,” it serves the geopolitical interests of the capitalist state.
The withdrawal from Afghanistan poses the question of where the hydra of the US and Australian military-industrial complexes will turn their heads towards next.
While the troops are set to be fully withdrawn, there was no mention of the presence of US and Australian private contractors in the country. Here Biden is pulling a sleight of hand; he’s not withdrawing from Afghanistan, he’s privatising the war effort. According to the Congressional Research Service.
“For the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, US Central Command reported 43,809 contractor personnel working for the Department of Defence within its area of responsibility, which included 27,388 individuals located in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.”
18,000 of them will remain in Afghanistan. Contractors are regularly used alongside the regular army to help to train and mentor security forces, aid in construction projects etc. These contractors are still employed by the US military and can be used at their discretion.
Luna Oi, a Vietnamese communist, very astutely noted on the 15th of April on Twitter that “Odd coincidence that the USA is winding down in Afghanistan just as they’re starting a cold war in Asia.” Biden stated very clearly this is exactly what the US military would be doing in coming years:
“We have to track and disrupt terrorist networks and operations that spread far beyond Afghanistan since 9/11. We have to shore up American competitiveness to meet the stiff competition we’re facing. From an increasingly assertive China, we have to strengthen our alliances and work with like-minded partners to ensure that the rules of international norms … are grounded in our democratic values, not those of the autocrats”
The military industrial complex perpetuates itself on the model of endless war, hot or cold. It will never cease destabilising whatever region it sees fit for the economic expansion of the global north. It is the ultimate machine for ensuring the domination of capital and has no regard for human life to that end. The endless war will not stop with Afghanistan.